Greenpeace reacts to the cancellation of the COP25 in Chile

Amsterdam, Netherlands – In reaction to President Piñera stating that the UNFCCC (COP25) will not occur in Santiago, International Executive Director Jennifer Morgan said:

“The government of Chile saying it cannot host COP 25 must not stop the debate in Chilean society on environmental and social injustice. We are in a climate crisis – civil dialogue and the right to peaceful protest have to be maintained. Postponing a meeting doesn’t postpone climate change and its impacts on the very people Piñera is claiming to protect. There’s never been a more vital time for voices to be heard; all over the world, people are clamouring for change. The channels for dialogue have to be kept open. Leaders cannot hide, instead they have to listen to the people’s demands and act urgently on the impact the climate crisis is having on our ecology and social fabric.”

Greenpeace Chile National Director, Matías Asun, said:

“By the Chilean government deciding not to hold the COP25 it has quit its responsibility to guarantee the full protection of human rights, the restoration of order and the democratic dialogue to build agreements. Civil dialogue and the right to peaceful protest has also been dropped with this decision. We are convinced that the restoration of order can only happen if the social demands of the people are addressed.

We are concerned about the fact that President Piñera’s government may decide to isolate itself from the international community. We must be able to solve the current problems in Chile with the support of the international community. This decision must not be allowed to reduce the ambition and the urgency to face the global climate crisis. We need climate action now.”

ENDS

Contacts:

Greenpeace International Press Desk: pressdesk.int@greenpeace.org, +31 (0)20 718 2470 (available 24 hours)

Source link

Read Previous

Appel du Dr Fanny Bauer-Motti à participer au rassemblement pour Tariq Ramadan.

Read Next

Dawood Rawat : « Mon crime c’est d’avoir désobéi à l’ordre établi depuis le 17ème siècle »

Leave a Reply